If we see only reflections of ourselves, it can feel like we are talking to a very agreeable version of our own mind, a kind of digital "yes" man.
But here is the subtle shift I have come to appreciate when conversing with AI. The quality of the response is shaped entirely by the quality of the question, the depth of the prompt, and the clarity of the context we offer.
So while it can mirror us passively, it can challenge, clarify, or even expand us, but only if we show up with intention.
In a way, the system is not a "yes" man. It is a thought partner that adapts to the level of depth we are willing to bring.
What we are really conversing with is not “the model”. We are interacting with a reflection of how we frame "meaning".
And that is where I believe the real magic (and responsibility) lies!
I like the term choreographed awareness. One question though if I am getting answers that reflect me then am I not having my own YES MAN.
That is a good question.
If we see only reflections of ourselves, it can feel like we are talking to a very agreeable version of our own mind, a kind of digital "yes" man.
But here is the subtle shift I have come to appreciate when conversing with AI. The quality of the response is shaped entirely by the quality of the question, the depth of the prompt, and the clarity of the context we offer.
So while it can mirror us passively, it can challenge, clarify, or even expand us, but only if we show up with intention.
In a way, the system is not a "yes" man. It is a thought partner that adapts to the level of depth we are willing to bring.
What we are really conversing with is not “the model”. We are interacting with a reflection of how we frame "meaning".
And that is where I believe the real magic (and responsibility) lies!